How to interpret the reliability assessment’s results?

titre_court

How to interpret the reliability assessment’s results?

question_xml

How to interpret the reliability assessment’s results?

reponse_xml

When a reliability assessment is run two values are given out; these values stand for the lowest and highest reliability expectations for the paper the assessment has been run in. To one paper is never associated only one reliability value because of the diversity of reliability of data this paper features.

The table below gives an outline of how to interpret reliability assessment’s values.

Low and high expectations are close and range between 1 to 2.5 (for a maximum of 5) or from 1 to 3.5 (for a maximum of 7).

All data featured by the paper have a similar low reliability value. The paper is slightly unreliable to very unreliable. Pictograms associated are a down-looking arrow in a red circle (slightly unreliable) and  (very unreliable).

Low and high expectations are close and range between 2.5 to 5 (for a maximum of 5) or from 3.5 up to 7 (for a maximum of 7).

All data featured by the paper have a similar high reliability value. The paper is slightly reliable to very reliable. Pictograms associated are  (slightly reliable) and  (very reliable)

Low and high expectations are far apart; low expectation ranges from 1 to 2.5 or 3.5 (if 7 is the maximum) and high expectation ranges from 2.5 or 3.5 to 5 or 7 (depending on the maximum).

There are conflicting evidences in the paper; some data are slightly to very reliable whereas some are slightly to very unreliable. The paper is considered having a neutral reliability value (mixed reliability). Pictogram associated is .

redacteur

FG

mots_clefs

XX

periode_de_visibilite

Toujours visible