Know more

Our use of cookies

Cookies are a set of data stored on a user’s device when the user browses a web site. The data is in a file containing an ID number, the name of the server which deposited it and, in some cases, an expiry date. We use cookies to record information about your visit, language of preference, and other parameters on the site in order to optimise your next visit and make the site even more useful to you.

To improve your experience, we use cookies to store certain browsing information and provide secure navigation, and to collect statistics with a view to improve the site’s features. For a complete list of the cookies we use, download “Ghostery”, a free plug-in for browsers which can detect, and, in some cases, block cookies.

Ghostery is available here for free: https://www.ghostery.com/fr/products/

You can also visit the CNIL web site for instructions on how to configure your browser to manage cookie storage on your device.

In the case of third-party advertising cookies, you can also visit the following site: http://www.youronlinechoices.com/fr/controler-ses-cookies/, offered by digital advertising professionals within the European Digital Advertising Alliance (EDAA). From the site, you can deny or accept the cookies used by advertising professionals who are members.

It is also possible to block certain third-party cookies directly via publishers:

Cookie type

Means of blocking

Analytical and performance cookies

Realytics
Google Analytics
Spoteffects
Optimizely

Targeted advertising cookies

DoubleClick
Mediarithmics

The following types of cookies may be used on our websites:

Mandatory cookies

Functional cookies

Social media and advertising cookies

These cookies are needed to ensure the proper functioning of the site and cannot be disabled. They help ensure a secure connection and the basic availability of our website.

These cookies allow us to analyse site use in order to measure and optimise performance. They allow us to store your sign-in information and display the different components of our website in a more coherent way.

These cookies are used by advertising agencies such as Google and by social media sites such as LinkedIn and Facebook. Among other things, they allow pages to be shared on social media, the posting of comments, and the publication (on our site or elsewhere) of ads that reflect your centres of interest.

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) uses CAS and PHP session cookies and the New Relic cookie for monitoring purposes (IP, response times).

These cookies are deleted at the end of the browsing session (when you log off or close your browser window)

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) uses the XiTi cookie to measure traffic. Our service provider is AT Internet. This company stores data (IPs, date and time of access, length of the visit and pages viewed) for six months.

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) does not use this type of cookie.

For more information about the cookies we use, contact INRA’s Data Protection Officer by email at cil-dpo@inra.fr or by post at:

INRA
24, chemin de Borde Rouge –Auzeville – CS52627
31326 Castanet Tolosan CEDEX - France

Dernière mise à jour : Mai 2018

Menu Logo Principal logo SOERE PRO Logo CIRAD Logo AnaEE Logo IRD Logo Ouagadougou university

Home page

RothC simulation of carbon accumulation in soil after repeated application of widely different organic amendments

Clément Peltre (a), Bent T. Christensen (b), Sophie Dragon (c), Christian Icard (c), Thomas Kätterer (d), Sabine Houot (a)

Peltre & al., 2012
Soil Biology & Biochemistry Volume 52, September 2012, Pages 49-60

Loss of soil organic C (SOC) may lead to reduced soil fertility and increased soil erosion [1]. The loss of SOC has been identified as a major threat towards the soil resource [2], and small but consistent increases in SOC could mitigate climate change effects by storing atmospheric CO2-C [3]. Application of exogenous organic matter (EOM) to cultivated land may lead to SOC accumulation [4]. Different EOMs differ in their potential contribution to SOC, depending on their origin and degree of transformation of the organic matter they contain [5]. Since C stocks change slowly, long-term field studies, such as long-term field experiments, are needed to evaluate the effects of repeated applications of EOM [6]. Models of C turnover in soil accurately simulate SOC dynamics in long-term field experiments under different climatic conditions and soil types [7]. In this study, RothC (one of the most widely used model that simulates SOC dynamic) was used to study changes in soil C stocks after repeated applications of EOM from four long-term experiments.

Main results

The RothC model simulates soil C dynamics by considering five organic C pools: a labile pool (DPM: “decomposable plant material”; mean residence time of 1.2 months), a resistant pool (RPM: “resistant plant material”; mean residence time of 3.3 yrs), a humified pool (HUM; mean residence time of 50 yrs), a microbial biomass pool (BIO; mean residence time 1.5 yrs) and a pool of inert organic matter that is not degraded (IOM). This model is widely used for predicting changes in C stocks of arable soils. However, rigorous routines for establishing entry pools that account for the diversity of EOM applied to croplands are still lacking. We obtained data on changes in soil C stocks after repeated applications of EOM from four long-term experiments (LTEs): Askov K2 (Denmark, 31 yrs), Qualiagro (France, 11 yrs) (figure), SERAIL (France, 14 yrs) and Ultuna (Sweden, 52 yrs).

Fig.1 Peltre 2012

Figure : Accumulation of soil C compared to reference plots after EOM applications during the Qualiagro experiment. Measured values (symbols, errors bars ¼ standard deviation) and values simulated with RothC using partition coefficients fitted with field data (black lines) or predicted using the IROC indicator (grey dashed lines). MSW: municipal solid waste compost, FYM: farmyard manure, GWS: green waste and sludge compost, BIOW: biowaste compost. -N: plots with minimum mineral N fertilization, +N: plots with optimum mineral N fertilization. Coefficient of variation of the RMSE (CV(RMSE)) and model efficiency (EF) of the simulations using the predicted partition coefficients calculated for the +N and -N parts of the experiment taken together, Delta CV(RMSE): difference between the CV(RMSE) values obtained using the predicted and fitted partition coefficients.

The adjustment of the partition coefficients of total organic C in EOM (EOM-TOC) into the labile, resistant and humified entry pools of RothC (fDPM, fRPM, fHUM, respectively) provided a successful fit to the accumulation of EOM-derived C in the LTE soils. Using the EOM partition coefficients calculated from the IROC indicator [8] resulted in RothC simulations with only slightly larger errors than simulations based on partition coefficients fitted from LTE soil data, except for EOMs that caused very large accumulations of C in soil (e.g. peat) possibly due to factors not accounted for in the RothC model, such as change in soil pH. The proposed partitioning of EOM-TOC allows the potential soil C storage after EOM applications to be predicted regardless of field location and specific composition of EOMs.

References

1. Ciais, P., Wattenbach, M., Vuichard, N., Smith, P., Piao, S.L., Don, A., Luyssaert, S., Janssens, I.A.,Bondeau, A.,Dechow, R., Leip, A., Smith, P.C.,Beer,C.,vanderWerf, G.R., Gervois, S., VanOost,K., Tomelleri, E., Freibauer, A., Schulze, E.D., 2010. The European carbon balance. Part 2: croplands. Global Change Biology 16, 1409-1428.

2. European Commission, 2006. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Framework for the Protection of Soil. http://ec. europa.eu/environment/soil/pdf/com_2006_0232_en.pdf.

3. Lal, R., Follett, R.F., Stewart, B.A., Kimble, J.M., 2007. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change and advance food security. Soil Science 172, 943-956.

4. Marmo, L., Feix, I., Bourmeau, E., Amlinger, F., Bannick, C.G., De Neve, S., Favoino, E., Gendebien, A., Gibert, J., Givelet, M., Leifert, I., Morris, R., Rodriguez Cruz, A., Ruck, F., Siebert, S., Tittarelli, F., 2004. Reports of the Technical Working Groups.

5. Bipfubusa, M., Angers, D.A., N’Dayegamiye, A., Antoun, H., 2008. Soil aggregation and biochemical properties following the application of fresh and composted organic amendments. Soil Science Society of America Journal 72, 160-166.

6. IPCC, 1997. Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. In: Reference Manual. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, vol. 3. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gl/invs6.html.

7. Smith, P., Smith, J.U., Powlson, D.S., McGill, W.B., Arah, J.R.M., Chertov, O.G., Coleman, K., Franko, U., Frolking, S., Jenkinson, D.S., Jensen, L.S., Kelly, R.H., Klein-Gunnewiek, H., Komarov, A.S., Li, C., Molina, J.A.E., Mueller, T., Parton,W.J., Thornley, J.H.M., Whitmore, A.P., 1997b. A comparison of the performance of nine soil organic matter models using datasets from seven long-term experiments. Geoderma 81, 153-225.

8. Lashermes, G., Nicolardot, B., Parnaudeau, V., Thuriès, L., Chaussod, R., Guillotin, M.L., Linères, M., Mary, B., Metzger, L., Morvan, T., Tricaud, A., Villette, C., Houot, S., 2009. Indicator of potential residual carbon in soils after exogenous organic matter application. European Journal of Soil Science 60, 297-310.

Affiliations

a INRA, UMR ECOSYS (previously EGC, Environnement et Grandes Cultures) INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France

b Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, AU Foulum, P.O.Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark

c Ctifl/SERAIL Experimental Station, 123 chemin du Finday, F-69126 Brindas, France

d Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7014, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden

See also

Houot, S., Pons, M.-N., Pradel, M., Caillaud, M.-A., Savini, I., Tibi, A., 2014. Valorisation des matières fertilisantes d'origine résiduaire sur les sols à usage agricole ou forestier. Impacts agronomiques, environnementaux, socio-économiques. Expertise scientifique collective. INRA-CNRS-Irstea. Synthèse. 113 pp. http://institut.inra.fr/Missions/Eclairer-les-decisions/Expertises/Toutes-lesactualites/ Expertise-Mafor-effluents-boues-et-dechets-organiques#.